Allied Veterans of the World Defense Attorney Lists Pam Bondi and Rick Scott

Possible Witnesses in Jacksonville Lawyer’s Criminal Trial

Posted on September 5, 2013 by Cynthia, 20 Miles Law, Jacksonville

I hope that the Allied Veterans of the World trial is televised. I want to be able to watch it. The trial will take place in Sanford FL, but Florida criminal attorneys throughout the state will want to know what is going on during the trial. The Allied Veteran’s scandal resulted in the arrest of 57 people. The “defendants accused of running a veterans’ charity as a front for a gambling operation are mounting a defense that Internet cafes are lawful based on the legal interpretations of some high-profile politicians and lawyers.” Attorney, Kelly Mathis, will be one of the first people to be tried.  (See Jacksonville Attorneys Request for Separate Trial Denied).  He is known by many Jacksonville Criminal Lawyers, because he is a former president of the Jacksonville Bar Association.

As the trial gets closer, Florida criminal lawyers are wondering want the defense will consist of.  The Miami Herald reported:

“Documents filed in the cases of the 57 Allied Veterans’ defendants show their defense will rely on statements, a campaign donation solicitation and ordinances passed by city and county officials throughout Florida. The documents show a belief by some elected officials that the legality of Internet cafes was no different than those of the defendants who are now charged with money laundering, possessing slot machines, keeping a gambling house and other crimes. ‘Clearly, a local government body would have no authority to regulate and zone activity that is already forbidden …’ defendant Kelly Mathis said in a motion arguing that local ordinances to regulate the Internet cafes should be allowed to be presented at his trial. ‘The fact that they did proves they too concluded the applicable state statutes did not outlaw the internet sweepstakes games.’”

Pam Bondi Image

How is Pam Bondi a potential defense witness in the trial?

Many high profile individuals were arrested in connection with this case.  There were also allegations that there were others involved.  “Former Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll resigned earlier this year after she was interviewed as part of the probe into Allied Veterans. She denies wrongdoing and hasn’t been charged with a crime.”  It appears that “the most visible effort to link a prominent politician with the belief in the Internet cafes’ legality was the failed effort by defense attorneys to subpoena Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi into giving a deposition.”  Defense attorneys requested that Bondi sumbit “to a deposition, saying the information they were seeking wasn’t relevant to the defendants’ guilt or innocence. The attorneys were seeking information about Bondi’s solicitation of a $25,000 campaign contribution from one of the companies whose owners are charged with crimes.”  Judge Lester denied the request.  He stated, “The logical inference from such testimony is that she thought that the businesses were lawfully operated, so the defendants are not guilty of the crimes alleged,” He did not believe that her opinion was relevant to the case and was inadmissible.

Defense attorneys have listed top political figures on the witness list.  These witness include “Gov. Rick Scott, Agriculture Secretary Adam Putnam and Bondi.”  It appears that the defense may be centered on the interpretation of the law.  I say this due to the fact that the Miami Herald further reported:

“Defense attorneys also are trying to allow at trial the testimony of local elected officials and their lawyers who drafted ordinances regulating the Internet cafes in their jurisdictions. One such attorney, a former general counsel for the city of Jacksonville, filed an affidavit attesting to the fact that Mathis didn’t break the law in advising Allied Veterans affiliates how to set up their businesses. Mathis was the registered agent for many of the Allied Veteran affiliates. ‘Indeed, my independent research and analysis … confirmed that Mr. Mathis was correctly interpreting these statutes, and their application to the manner in which his client, Allied Veterans, conducted electronic sweepstakes on the computers made available to their patrons,’ said Steven Rohan in the affidavit.”.

Comments are closed.